Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kamil Majchrzak vs Thiemo De Bakker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Majchrzak vs Bakker analysis and find out who is favored!
Kamil Majchrzak vs Thiemo De Bakker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Majchrzak 0 - 0 Bakker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Majchrzak has won 59.57% of points on his second serve, while Bakker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Majchrzak, in recent form, has won 53.62% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bakker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.25% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Majchrzak has saved 69.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bakker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Majchrzak has won 82.22% of matches played (W/L 37/ 8), with Bakker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Majchrzak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 220/ 115), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 38/ 29). Bakker has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Majchrzak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 3), where as Bakker has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Majchrzak has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.56 while Bakker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Majchrzak has won 78% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bakker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Majchrzak has converted 46.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bakker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kamil Majchrzak | Thiemo De Bakker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 82% (37/8) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 78% (76/22) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 64% (548/308) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (16/4) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 86% (19/3) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 170 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:20 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.56 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1502/2432) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (1137/1502) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 60% (554/930) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (145/312) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1135/2579) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (15/5) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 88% (21/3) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 84% (37/44) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 97% (37/36) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (37/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 1st Match |
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ryan Seggerman
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Alexander Weis
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jonas Forejtek
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Gauthier Onclin
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Karim-Mohamed Maamoun
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
5
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Majchrzak Vs Bakker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
